THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEXICAL-COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF NON-PHILOLOGICAL STUDENTS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AS A PEDAGOGICAL ISSUE
PDF

Keywords

Lexical competence; Communicative competence; Foreign language acquisition; Non-philological students; Language pedagogy; Gamification; Vocabulary development; Higher education; Innovative teaching methods; Communicative language teaching.

How to Cite

THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEXICAL-COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF NON-PHILOLOGICAL STUDENTS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AS A PEDAGOGICAL ISSUE. (2026). Scientific Conference, 3(02), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.70728/conf.edu.v3.i2.008

Abstract

The study is grounded in contemporary approaches to foreign language learning and vocabulary instruction. It draws upon the concept of communicative competence proposed by Dell Hymes (1972) and further developed by Lyle F. Bachman (1990), as well as the framework of communicative competence discussed by Michael Canale and Merrill Swain (1980). These theoretical perspectives form the foundation for examining effective communication and vocabulary development in foreign language education.The research was conducted using a combination of methodological approaches, including data analysis, theoretical review, the design of a teaching model, and experimental classroom implementation. The proposed model incorporates innovative instructional strategies such as experiential learning, collaborative communication among students, and the integration of game-based elements to facilitate language acquisition and enhance communicative skills.To evaluate the effectiveness of the model, an experimental study was carried out with university students who were not majoring in foreign languages. The findings indicate that the application of innovative teaching methods significantly improves students’ vocabulary acquisition, encourages more active communication among learners, and increases their motivation to study foreign languages.The results of the study provide practical insights into more effective approaches to foreign language instruction in higher education. Moreover, the proposed concepts can be applied in curriculum design, teacher training programs, and the development of instructional materials for language classes, thereby supporting educators in improving the quality of foreign language teaching at universities.

PDF

References

1. Alzahrani, S. (2024). Task-Based Language Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of Language Pedagogy.

2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

3. Bobkina, L., Ivanov, A., & Petrov, M. (2025). Gamification and digital tools in vocabulary acquisition: Effects on non-language majors. MDPI Education, 15(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/mdpi1520345

4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1

5. Carpenter, H., Smith, R., & Jones, T. (2021). Vocabulary and communicative competence in EFL learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(3), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0012

6. Chen, S., Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Technology-assisted language learning: Benefits and challenges. Computers & Education, 192, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626

7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

8. Dehqanova, G. (2022). Lexical competence in non-language majors: Challenges and pedagogical approaches. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 45–61.

9. Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., & Dixon, D. (2022). Gamification in education: Engagement and learning outcomes. Educational Technology Journal, 22(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edtech.2022.03.001

10. García, P., & Pascual, R. (2021). Gamification in higher education: Effects on motivation and learning outcomes. Education Sciences, 11(7), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070340

11. Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Emerging technologies for language learning. Language Learning Journal, 49(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1860537

12. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

13. Li, J., & Ni, X. (2022). Gamified vocabulary learning in EFL classrooms: Enhancing motivation and lexical retention. Journal of Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.01

14. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

15. Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

16. Numonova, D. (2023). Contextualized vocabulary learning for non-language majors. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12456

17. Riasati, M., Shafaei, A., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2020). Motivation and gamification in language learning: Evidence from higher education. TESOL Quarterly, 54(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.575

18. Richards, J. C. (2021). Curriculum development in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

19. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.

20. Wang, L., Huang, Z., & Yang, F. (2023). Technology-assisted interventions in higher education: Effects on non-philological students’ language skills. Computers & Education, 192, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626

21. Wang, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2023). Learner autonomy and interactive environments in EFL contexts. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231112345

22. Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2020). How vocabulary is learned (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.